Make (ex-Integromat) vs n8n
Which tool to choose in 2026?
Automation📊 Comparison radar
Make (ex-Integromat)
n8n
Understand our rating system →
📋 General information
Make (ex-Integromat)
Rating
★★★★☆ 4.2/5
Pricing
Freemium
Price detail
Free (1,000 credits/mo) · Core: ~$9/mo · Pro: ~$16/mo · Teams: ~$29/mo · Enterprise: custom
Company
Celonis
Launched
2012
Platforms
web
n8n
Rating
★★★★★ 4.8/5
Pricing
Freemium
Price detail
Free (self-hosted) · Starter: ~$24/mo · Pro: ~$60/mo · Enterprise: custom
Company
n8n GmbH
Launched
2019
Platforms
web, api
✨ Features
| Feature | Make (ex-Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visual workflow editor | ✅ | — |
| 3,000+ integrations | ✅ | — |
| AI Agents (beta) | ✅ | — |
| MCP server | ✅ | — |
| Routers and iterators | ✅ | — |
| Code App (JS/Python) | ✅ | — |
| Open-source (Fair-code) | — | ✅ |
| Self-hosting possible | — | ✅ |
| 500+ integrations | — | ✅ |
| AI Agent nodes | — | ✅ |
| Custom code (JS/Python) | — | ✅ |
| 1,000+ workflow templates | — | ✅ |
⚖️ Pros & Cons
🔧 Make (ex-Integromat)
- Visual drag-and-drop interface far more readable than Zapier for complex multi-branch workflows
- 3,000+ native connectors covering CRM, ERP, marketing, databases and 350+ AI apps
- Routers, iterators, aggregators and subscenarios enable logic no other no-code tool can match
- Best value in automation: Core plan at ~$9/mo with 10k credits — a fraction of Zapier for equivalent volume
- Native AI Agents (beta), MCP server and AI Toolkit built in — no third-party AI integrations needed
- Significant learning curve for non-technical beginners — routers and iterators are powerful but not intuitive
- Credit-based billing can spike unpredictably on high-volume workflows with many modules
- No self-hosted option: all data hosted on Celonis servers (EU or US) — not suitable for full sovereignty
🔗 n8n
- 100% open-source and self-hostable: your data never leaves your server — exceptional for GDPR and sovereignty
- Native AI Agent nodes for building RAG pipelines, LLM chains and autonomous agents directly in workflows
- Code nodes (JavaScript/Python) for unlimited flexibility — anything that cannot be done visually can be coded
- Community of 50k+ members and marketplace with 1,000+ ready-made templates for every use case
- Most affordable option: ~$24/mo cloud or completely free when self-hosted on your own infrastructure
- Interface more technical than Zapier or Make — requires understanding data flows and JSON structures
- Fewer native integrations (500+) than Make (3,000+) or Zapier (8,000+), though growing rapidly
- Self-hosting requires DevOps skills (Docker, reverse proxy, SSL, backups) — not trivial for non-technical teams
🏆 Verdict
🔧 Choose Make (ex-Integromat)
The best power-to-price ratio in automation. Make outperforms Zapier as soon as workflows exceed 3 steps, now with 3,000+ apps, native AI Agents and MCP. The credit-based model remains far more economical, but watch costs on high-volume scenarios.
🔗 Choose n8n
The undisputed champion of data sovereignty and AI automation. n8n is the only tool combining open-source, self-hosting, native AI Agents and a 50k+ community. More technical than Zapier, but infinitely more flexible and economical at scale.
Make (ex-Integromat)